David Leonhart is right. (NYT, 9/8/09, “Colleges Are Failing in Graduation Rates“). We need to graduate more of the students who currently enter college at age 18. And he is right again when he identifies the shortage of skilled college graduates as a significant threat to our social, civic, and economic welfare.
But relying on the logic inĀ ”Not Crossing the Finish Line”, a recent book by William Bowen and Michael McPherson, doesn’t solve the problems identified. Graduating a higher percentage of current learners as Bowen and McPherson advocate is, at best, only 50% of the solution. As a Princeton Alum, president emeritus of a community college (Community College of Vermont) and a state university (Cal State Monterey Bay), I’d love to agree with them. But their proposal, getting the existing institutions to do better and graduate more 22 year olds, is neither broad enough nor deep enough to succeed.
CATEGORIES
RECENT COMMENTS
- I am totally ashamed of the wasted talents, lack of utilizing human and other resources in...
A New Ecology of Learning - Will, The role of affect in education has been an issue that has preoccupied me...
The Affective Dimension of Learning - Sydney, Thanks for the comment! I, too, find that fear is a huge barrier to...
The Affective Dimension of Learning - I have to agree with Stanley Kaplan. I teach programming and I want my students to...
The Affective Dimension of Learning - I was...
The Center for American Progress’ Call for a U.S. Office of Consumer Protection in Higher Education
